public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/12581] [3.4 Regression] gcc rejects typeof use for the return type
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 01:25:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031022012440.21975.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031011162654.12581.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12581


bangerth at dealii dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-10-22 01:24:40
               date|                            |
            Summary|[3.4 Regression ] gcc       |[3.4 Regression] gcc rejects
                   |rejects typeof use for the  |typeof use for the return
                   |return type                 |type


------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-10-22 01:24 -------
A darn good argument against introducing extensions as operators! 
 
I think it can be called a regression, since it used to work. I would bet this is introduced 
by the new parser, so I'll tentatively assign it to Mark. He'll know for sure. 
 
I can't help setting this to low priority, though, since I think it's so obscure... 
 
W.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-22  1:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-11 16:26 [Bug c++/12581] New: [3.4 Regression ] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-13  3:27 ` [Bug c++/12581] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-16 16:14 ` ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de
2003-10-22  1:25 ` bangerth at dealii dot org [this message]
2003-10-22  1:27 ` [Bug c++/12581] [3.4 Regression] " bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-11-12  3:14 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-12  3:16 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-12 12:35 ` gabor dot greif at lucent dot com
2003-11-12 12:43 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-11-12 14:03 ` gabor dot greif at lucent dot com
2003-11-12 14:29 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-11-12 16:14 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-13  8:23 ` gabor dot greif at lucent dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031022012440.21975.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).