From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22445 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2003 20:06:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22430 invoked by uid 48); 22 Oct 2003 20:06:32 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031022200632.22429.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031022170846.12726.mr_W@mindnever.org> References: <20031022170846.12726.mr_W@mindnever.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/12726] [3.3.2/3.4 regression] ICE (segfault) on trivial code X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg01945.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12726 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason at redhat dot com ------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-22 20:06 ------- Jason, I suspect your patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-10/msg00551.html as being responsible for the regression. (I can't check right now, though.) Could you please have a look anyway?