From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-73659-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23909 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2003 20:07:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23858 invoked by uid 48); 22 Oct 2003 20:07:46 -0000
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:07:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20031022200746.23857.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20030502041600.10597.tromey@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20030502041600.10597.tromey@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcj/10597] core classes must not have observable synchronization
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg01948.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10597


tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-10-22 20:07 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 9250 ***