From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21855 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2003 20:17:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21840 invoked by uid 48); 23 Oct 2003 20:17:06 -0000 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 20:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031023201706.21839.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030503070600.10610.doko@net.local> References: <20030503070600.10610.doko@net.local> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/10610] [powerpc-linux] 230 testsuite failures due to alignment errors X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg02064.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10610 andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed|2003-10-01 04:48:49 |2003-10-23 20:17:05 date| | ------- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-23 20:17 ------- I can confirm this behavior on mainline gcc-3.4. Built the runtimelibs with --enable-debug. And ran the libjava testsuite. Lots of failures due to this assert. The libffi testsuite has one failure. I guess the testcase itself is not quite correct. Fails also on darwin and solaris9 with --enable-debug. I will investigate further on mainline, the patchlet from franzo not yet tested. Further results will follow.