[Bug debug/7360] g++ generates illegal debug info on Solaris that crashes gdb

public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [Bug debug/7360] g++ generates illegal debug info on Solaris that crashes gdb
       [not found] <20020719131601.7360.rohlfing@stanford.edu>
@ 2003-05-25  4:59 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
  2003-05-25 13:23 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-05-25  4:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7360



------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-05-25 04:50 -------
Hello,

sorry to see that gcc 3.2 still has this problem. Do you know if this issue is still present in gcc 3.3? 
Thanks,

Dara



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/7360] g++ generates illegal debug info on Solaris that crashes gdb
       [not found] <20020719131601.7360.rohlfing@stanford.edu>
  2003-05-25  4:59 ` [Bug debug/7360] g++ generates illegal debug info on Solaris that crashes gdb dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-05-25 13:23 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
  2003-08-21 19:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia@physics.uc.edu @ 2003-05-25 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7360


pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/7360] g++ generates illegal debug info on Solaris that crashes gdb
       [not found] <20020719131601.7360.rohlfing@stanford.edu>
  2003-05-25  4:59 ` [Bug debug/7360] g++ generates illegal debug info on Solaris that crashes gdb dhazeghi@yahoo.com
  2003-05-25 13:23 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
@ 2003-08-21 19:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-08-28 20:34 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-21 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7360


pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |drow at mvista dot com


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-21 19:29 -------
Daniel do you know if this still a problem in 3.3 or the mainline?
The reason why I am asking is that Dara asked for feedback almost three months ago and there 
has been no response and I looked at the gdb bug and your name came up in the bug, and you 
analysised the problem in that bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/7360] g++ generates illegal debug info on Solaris that crashes gdb
       [not found] <20020719131601.7360.rohlfing@stanford.edu>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-08-21 19:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-28 20:34 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-24 17:12 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: drow at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-28 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7360



------- Additional Comments From drow at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-28 20:34 -------
No idea.  It only manifeste on Solaris targets I think, and I don't have a Solaris
toolchain set up.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/7360] g++ generates illegal debug info on Solaris that crashes gdb
       [not found] <20020719131601.7360.rohlfing@stanford.edu>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-08-28 20:34 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-24 17:12 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
  2003-10-24 22:19 ` drow at mvista dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-10-24 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7360

------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com  2003-10-24 17:12 -------
Harrumph, this is what I get with 3.3.1 and gdb 5.3:

bash-2.05b$ gdb test
GNU gdb 5.3
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "sparc-sun-solaris2.8"...
(gdb) list D
Line number 20 out of range; classes.cxx has 5 lines.

This a gdb problem, a gcc problem, or me just being dense?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/7360] g++ generates illegal debug info on Solaris that crashes gdb
       [not found] <20020719131601.7360.rohlfing@stanford.edu>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-10-24 17:12 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2003-10-24 22:19 ` drow at mvista dot com
  2003-10-28 16:27 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-28 16:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: drow at mvista dot com @ 2003-10-24 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7360



------- Additional Comments From drow at mvista dot com  2003-10-24 22:13 -------
Subject: Re:  g++ generates illegal debug info on Solaris that crashes gdb

On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 05:12:19PM -0000, dhazeghi at yahoo dot com wrote:
> (gdb) list D
> Line number 20 out of range; classes.cxx has 5 lines.
> 
> This a gdb problem, a gcc problem, or me just being dense?

Either (A) or (B).  Could you attach the binary that shows that
problem?  Then I'll take a look at it.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/7360] g++ generates illegal debug info on Solaris that crashes gdb
       [not found] <20020719131601.7360.rohlfing@stanford.edu>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-10-24 22:19 ` drow at mvista dot com
@ 2003-10-28 16:27 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-28 16:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: drow at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-28 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7360



------- Additional Comments From drow at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-10-28 16:23 -------
Hi Dara,

The out-of-range line number is a GCC bug (but a different one).
The unbalanced N_FUN markers do not appear in your binary, so I believe
the original problem is fixed; you may wish to open a new PR.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/7360] g++ generates illegal debug info on Solaris that crashes gdb
       [not found] <20020719131601.7360.rohlfing@stanford.edu>
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-10-28 16:27 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-28 16:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-28 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7360


pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-10-28 16:27 -------
Closing as the original problem is fixed, Dara open up a new bug for the problem you found.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-28 16:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20020719131601.7360.rohlfing@stanford.edu>
2003-05-25  4:59 ` [Bug debug/7360] g++ generates illegal debug info on Solaris that crashes gdb dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-05-25 13:23 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-08-21 19:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-28 20:34 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-24 17:12 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-10-24 22:19 ` drow at mvista dot com
2003-10-28 16:27 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-28 16:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).