From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28005 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2003 23:02:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27992 invoked by uid 48); 24 Oct 2003 23:02:33 -0000 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 23:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031024230233.27989.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "dhazeghi at yahoo dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030109082607.9249.cludwig@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> References: <20030109082607.9249.cludwig@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/9249] bootstrap fails with --enable-__cxa-atexit on Solaris X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg02223.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9249 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |neroden at gcc dot gnu dot | |org ------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-10-24 23:02 ------- I can create the relevant patch for configure.texi if necessary. However, is it practical to test for cxa_atexit in configure, and error out if it is enabled, but not supported? Thanks.