From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25693 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2003 13:11:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25677 invoked by uid 48); 25 Oct 2003 13:11:44 -0000 Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 15:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031025131144.25676.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030413145600.10392.marcus@mc.pp.se> References: <20030413145600.10392.marcus@mc.pp.se> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/10392] [3.3/3.4 regression] [SH] optimizer generates faulty array indexing X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg02277.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10392 ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joern dot rennecke at superh | |dot com AssignedTo|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |org |dot org Status|ASSIGNED |NEW ------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-25 13:11 ------- I don't really know what to do with this PR. The current situation is: - the patch was approved for 3.3 branch, - the patch reportedly introduces a regression in a particular package on SH4, - the bug doesn't show up on mainline (but is latent). I give up, all the more that I don't have access to SH hardware. If a SH maintainer wants to take care of it...