public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/12801] New: [3.4 regression] labug1.f fails
@ 2003-10-28  1:07 billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-28 16:06 ` [Bug optimization/12801] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-28  1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12801

           Summary: [3.4 regression] labug1.f fails
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin

Regression test g77.f-torture/execute/labug1.f execution fails
on i686-pc-cygwin with current CVS head

FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/labug1.f execution,  -O2 
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/labug1.f execution,  -O3 -g 

The failure was introduced around Fri Oct 17 2003:
 - Passes: Thu Oct 16 08:19:44 GMT 2003
 - Fails: Fri Oct 17 14:00:02 GMT 2003
Note that times are approximate as CVS update from local copy.

Independent confirmation on cygwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg01188.html

No evidence on other platforms.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/12801] [3.4 regression] labug1.f fails
  2003-10-28  1:07 [Bug fortran/12801] New: [3.4 regression] labug1.f fails billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-28 16:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-03 18:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-19  7:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-28 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12801


pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
          Component|fortran                     |optimization
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-10-28 15:43:22
               date|                            |
   Target Milestone|---                         |3.4


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-10-28 15:43 -------
This "No evidence on other platforms." is not true as powerpc-apple-darwin6.3 fails also and so 
does any powerpc-*-* ones.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/12801] [3.4 regression] labug1.f fails
  2003-10-28  1:07 [Bug fortran/12801] New: [3.4 regression] labug1.f fails billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-28 16:06 ` [Bug optimization/12801] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-03 18:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-19  7:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-03 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-03 18:59 -------
PPC no longer fails, can you see if this is still a problem on cygwin?

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 GCC target triplet|i686-pc-cygwin, powerpc-*-* |i686-pc-cygwin


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12801


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/12801] [3.4 regression] labug1.f fails
  2003-10-28  1:07 [Bug fortran/12801] New: [3.4 regression] labug1.f fails billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-28 16:06 ` [Bug optimization/12801] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-03 18:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-19  7:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-19  7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-19 07:00 -------
Fixed: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-12/msg00724.html>

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12801


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-19  7:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-28  1:07 [Bug fortran/12801] New: [3.4 regression] labug1.f fails billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-28 16:06 ` [Bug optimization/12801] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-03 18:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-19  7:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).