* [Bug c++/12807] [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-28 10:17 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-28 10:37 ` falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-28 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Summary|[tree-ssa] ICE on invalid |[tree-ssa] ICE on variable
|variable sized array in |sized array in class
|class |
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-28 10:12 -------
Oops, the code seems to be valid.
So the ICE is even worse here.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-28 10:17 ` [Bug c++/12807] [tree-ssa] ICE on " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-28 10:37 ` falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2003-10-28 10:45 ` reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2003-10-28 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
------- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-10-28 10:31 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
"reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> Oops, the code seems to be valid.
No, since the static member is not initialized with a const
expression. Otherwise, gcc wouldn't know sizeof() of the class.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-28 10:17 ` [Bug c++/12807] [tree-ssa] ICE on " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-28 10:37 ` falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2003-10-28 10:45 ` reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de
2003-10-28 10:45 ` reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de @ 2003-10-28 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de 2003-10-28 10:45 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
On 28 Oct, falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-10-28 10:31 -------
> Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
>
> "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Oops, the code seems to be valid.
>
> No, since the static member is not initialized with a const
> expression. Otherwise, gcc wouldn't know sizeof() of the class.
Well, I think it's an instance of the variable sized array extension.
You just have a pointer there, as far as I understand it. The memory is
allocated in a different location at runtime. So there should be no
problem to compute sizeof().
Btw, all versions since 3.0 accept the code - and since 3.3.1 they
reject it if -pedantic is specified.
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de 2003-10-28 10:45 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
On 28 Oct, falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-10-28 10:31 -------
> Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
>
> "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Oops, the code seems to be valid.
>
> No, since the static member is not initialized with a const
> expression. Otherwise, gcc wouldn't know sizeof() of the class.
Well, I think it's an instance of the variable sized array extension.
You just have a pointer there, as far as I understand it. The memory is
allocated in a different location at runtime. So there should be no
problem to compute sizeof().
Btw, all versions since 3.0 accept the code - and since 3.3.1 they
reject it if -pedantic is specified.
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de 2003-10-28 10:45 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
On 28 Oct, falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-10-28 10:31 -------
> Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
>
> "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Oops, the code seems to be valid.
>
> No, since the static member is not initialized with a const
> expression. Otherwise, gcc wouldn't know sizeof() of the class.
Well, I think it's an instance of the variable sized array extension.
You just have a pointer there, as far as I understand it. The memory is
allocated in a different location at runtime. So there should be no
problem to compute sizeof().
Btw, all versions since 3.0 accept the code - and since 3.3.1 they
reject it if -pedantic is specified.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-28 10:45 ` reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de
@ 2003-10-28 10:45 ` reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de
2003-10-28 10:48 ` reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de @ 2003-10-28 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de 2003-10-28 10:45 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
On 28 Oct, falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-10-28 10:31 -------
> Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
>
> "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Oops, the code seems to be valid.
>
> No, since the static member is not initialized with a const
> expression. Otherwise, gcc wouldn't know sizeof() of the class.
Well, I think it's an instance of the variable sized array extension.
You just have a pointer there, as far as I understand it. The memory is
allocated in a different location at runtime. So there should be no
problem to compute sizeof().
Btw, all versions since 3.0 accept the code - and since 3.3.1 they
reject it if -pedantic is specified.
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de 2003-10-28 10:45 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
On 28 Oct, falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-10-28 10:31 -------
> Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
>
> "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Oops, the code seems to be valid.
>
> No, since the static member is not initialized with a const
> expression. Otherwise, gcc wouldn't know sizeof() of the class.
Well, I think it's an instance of the variable sized array extension.
You just have a pointer there, as far as I understand it. The memory is
allocated in a different location at runtime. So there should be no
problem to compute sizeof().
Btw, all versions since 3.0 accept the code - and since 3.3.1 they
reject it if -pedantic is specified.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-28 10:45 ` reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de
@ 2003-10-28 10:48 ` reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de
2003-10-28 11:07 ` falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de @ 2003-10-28 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de 2003-10-28 10:45 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
On 28 Oct, falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-10-28 10:31 -------
> Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
>
> "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Oops, the code seems to be valid.
>
> No, since the static member is not initialized with a const
> expression. Otherwise, gcc wouldn't know sizeof() of the class.
Well, I think it's an instance of the variable sized array extension.
You just have a pointer there, as far as I understand it. The memory is
allocated in a different location at runtime. So there should be no
problem to compute sizeof().
Btw, all versions since 3.0 accept the code - and since 3.3.1 they
reject it if -pedantic is specified.
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de 2003-10-28 10:45 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
On 28 Oct, falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-10-28 10:31 -------
> Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
>
> "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Oops, the code seems to be valid.
>
> No, since the static member is not initialized with a const
> expression. Otherwise, gcc wouldn't know sizeof() of the class.
Well, I think it's an instance of the variable sized array extension.
You just have a pointer there, as far as I understand it. The memory is
allocated in a different location at runtime. So there should be no
problem to compute sizeof().
Btw, all versions since 3.0 accept the code - and since 3.3.1 they
reject it if -pedantic is specified.
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de 2003-10-28 10:45 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
On 28 Oct, falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-10-28 10:31 -------
> Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
>
> "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Oops, the code seems to be valid.
>
> No, since the static member is not initialized with a const
> expression. Otherwise, gcc wouldn't know sizeof() of the class.
Well, I think it's an instance of the variable sized array extension.
You just have a pointer there, as far as I understand it. The memory is
allocated in a different location at runtime. So there should be no
problem to compute sizeof().
Btw, all versions since 3.0 accept the code - and since 3.3.1 they
reject it if -pedantic is specified.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-28 10:48 ` reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de
@ 2003-10-28 11:07 ` falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2003-10-28 14:45 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2003-10-28 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
------- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-10-28 10:58 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
"reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> Well, I think it's an instance of the variable sized array
> extension.
Hm, could you point me to the documentation for that?
> You just have a pointer there, as far as I understand it. The memory
> is allocated in a different location at runtime. So there should be
> no problem to compute sizeof().
>
> Btw, all versions since 3.0 accept the code - and since 3.3.1 they
> reject it if -pedantic is specified.
But not this:
struct A
{
static int n;
char text[n];
};
So it's probably rather a bug in 3.3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-28 11:07 ` falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2003-10-28 14:45 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-10-28 15:10 ` falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2003-10-28 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-10-28 14:44:30
date| |
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-10-28 14:44 -------
Variably sized arrays are new in C, but shouldn't be accepted in C++ in
strict conformance mode.
That being said, I can reproduce the ICE which is always an error.
W.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-28 14:45 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2003-10-28 15:10 ` falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2003-10-29 6:13 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2003-10-28 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
------- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-10-28 15:01 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
"bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> Variably sized arrays are new in C, but shouldn't be accepted in C++
> in strict conformance mode.
Well, in C99, you can do
f(int n) { int x[n]; }
and
struct f { int a; int x[]; }
but not
struct f { int a; int x[a]; }
or something, which is what produces the ICE.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-28 15:10 ` falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2003-10-29 6:13 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-10-29 6:48 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2003-10-29 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-10-29 06:11 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
"reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Oops, the code seems to be valid.
No. The program is invalid.
-- Gaby
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-29 6:13 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2003-10-29 6:48 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-10-30 5:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2003-10-29 6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-10-29 06:13 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
"bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Variably sized arrays are new in C, but shouldn't be accepted in C++ in
| strict conformance mode.
I see no relation with the code you showed: It still is invalid.
-- Gaby
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-29 6:48 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2003-10-30 5:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-01 3:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-30 5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Target Milestone|--- |tree-ssa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] [tree-ssa] ICE on variable sized array in class
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-30 5:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-01 3:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-04 2:45 ` [Bug c++/12807] Failure to diagnose VLA in template rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-01 3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |accepts-invalid
Last reconfirmed|2003-10-28 14:44:30 |2003-12-01 03:25:14
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] Failure to diagnose VLA in template
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2003-12-01 3:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-02-04 2:45 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-24 12:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-02-04 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-04 02:45 -------
The bug, IMO, is that the front end did not diagnose the error. If it had
done that, we wouldn't have tried to do silly things with the garbage trees
in the optimizers.
Since this isn't diagnosed on mainline either, I'm moving the bug there.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |
Summary|[tree-ssa] ICE on variable |Failure to diagnose VLA in
|sized array in class |template
Target Milestone|tree-ssa |3.5.0
Version|tree-ssa |3.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] Failure to diagnose VLA in template
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2004-02-04 2:45 ` [Bug c++/12807] Failure to diagnose VLA in template rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-24 12:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-12 0:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-13 13:08 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-24 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |minor
Target Milestone|3.5.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] Failure to diagnose VLA in template
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-24 12:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-12 0:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-13 13:08 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-12 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |16994
nThis| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/12807] Failure to diagnose VLA in template
2003-10-28 10:12 [Bug c++/12807] New: [tree-ssa] ICE on invalid variable sized array in class reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-12 0:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-13 13:08 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-13 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-13 13:08 -------
Fixed by Mark's patch for PR18429.
In fact PR12807 is more or less a duplicate of PR18429.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18429 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread