From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14614 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2003 13:00:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14606 invoked by uid 48); 30 Oct 2003 13:00:17 -0000 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031030130017.14605.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pratap at vmware dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031027231944.12799.pratap@vmware.com> References: <20031027231944.12799.pratap@vmware.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/12799] [3.4 regression] faulty mov->add change clobbers the CC register X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg02731.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12799 ------- Additional Comments From pratap at vmware dot com 2003-10-30 13:00 ------- Hmmm ... Pratap like beers ... Kidding aside, thanks a bunch for the deep analysis. Your response is perfectly satisfactory. May I make one more suggestion: Before this PR is closed, could the test case that I submitted be added to the standard regression test suite? The way I have written the test, it should integrate well into a suite of executable tests, or a suite where you compare the generated assembly. Thanks, again. We will use 3.3.x with a lot more confidence now.