From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27871 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2003 23:23:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27862 invoked by uid 48); 30 Oct 2003 23:23:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 23:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031030232301.27861.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031008065459.12536.jhr.walter@t-online.de> References: <20031008065459.12536.jhr.walter@t-online.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/12536] Regression regarding partial ordering X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg02774.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12536 ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-10-30 23:22 ------- For what it's worth: here is what icc 7 says: g/x> ./a.out foo bar g/x> icc x.cc -Xc -ansi g/x> ./a.out foo bar The same holds for a development snapshot of icc8 I happen to have around. W.