public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/12877] conditional as lvalue gives wrong warning
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 21:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031102213631.15814.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031102182114.12877.falk@debian.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12877



------- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de  2003-11-02 21:36 -------
Subject: Re:  conditional as lvalue gives wrong warning

"jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

> > But it's a conditional, not a cast, and I think this extension isn't
> > deprecated.
> 
> The cast is implicit; the semantics of conditional expressions mean that
> the chars are converted to a common type of int before the conditional
> expression is applied to them.

Well, as a technical term, casts are always explicit; what happens is
a conversion. So IMHO the message is still wrong.

> Essentially, the extension in question wasn't properly thought out
> for anything other than the case of a common type that is unaffected
> by the integer promotions.  The problem is arguably that we don't
> get a hard error here.

C++ has deal with it, so if we really wanted to, it should be possible
to come up with sensible semantics.

> This extension only isn't deprecated *yet* so that the deprecations
> (and any associated problems) could be dealt with one at a time.  PR
> 11427 has a specific suggestion that it be deprecated and no
> objections thereto.  I'm inclined on that basis to go ahead with
> deprecating conditional expressions as lvalues in C for 3.4, and
> then follow with compound expressions, also for 3.4.

I agree.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-11-02 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-02 18:21 [Bug c/12877] New: " falk at debian dot org
2003-11-02 21:10 ` [Bug c/12877] " jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
2003-11-02 21:36 ` falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de [this message]
2003-11-05  4:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-09  2:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-21 23:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-23  3:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031102213631.15814.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).