From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16850 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2003 14:57:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16830 invoked by uid 48); 7 Nov 2003 14:57:52 -0000 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 14:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031107145752.16828.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20010920172600.4372.carlo@alinoe.com> References: <20010920172600.4372.carlo@alinoe.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/4372] #pragma weak pthread* inclusion causes applications to crash without a linker error when one forgets to link with -lpthread X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00481.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4372 carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed|2003-11-05 07:54:39 |2003-11-07 14:57:51 date| | ------- Additional Comments From carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-07 14:57 ------- Still in mainline. Can't we just remove the #pragma's from bits/gthr-default.h? That was the suggestion solution in this thread and it makes sense to me. If not, then please just close this PR with a WONTFIX.