public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug driver/12951] New: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized
@ 2003-11-07 21:45 gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-08 8:17 ` [Bug c/12951] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-07 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12951
Summary: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
Although the claim is that all -W<warn> options also accept the -Wno-<warn>
form, this is not true for -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration.
Environment:
System: SunOS xayide 5.10 s10_42 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-1
Architecture: sun4
host: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
build: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
target: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
configured with: /vol/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/configure --prefix=/vol/gcc --with-local-prefix=/vol/gcc --disable-nls
How-To-Repeat:
$ touch test.c
$ ./xgcc -B./ -c -Werror-implicit-function-declaration test.c
$ ./xgcc -B./ -c -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration test.c
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/12951] -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized
2003-11-07 21:45 [Bug driver/12951] New: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-08 8:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-28 9:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-08 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-08 08:17 -------
I can confirm this on the mainline (20031105) and all the way to 2.95.3.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|driver |c
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-11-08 08:17:28
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12951
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/12951] -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized
2003-11-07 21:45 [Bug driver/12951] New: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-08 8:17 ` [Bug c/12951] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-28 9:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-07 14:28 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-28 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-28 05:59 -------
This is a documentation problem, I think.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12951
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/12951] -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized
2003-11-07 21:45 [Bug driver/12951] New: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-08 8:17 ` [Bug c/12951] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-28 9:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-07 14:28 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-09-24 23:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-24 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de @ 2004-01-07 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2004-01-07 14:28 -------
Subject: Re: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized
> This is a documentation problem, I think.
Why? Any reason the -Wno-... form shouldn't work in this particular case?
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12951
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/12951] -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized
2003-11-07 21:45 [Bug driver/12951] New: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-07 14:28 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
@ 2004-09-24 23:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-24 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-24 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-24 23:18 -------
Subject: Bug 12951
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: jsm28@gcc.gnu.org 2004-09-24 23:18:03
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog
gcc/doc : invoke.texi
Log message:
PR c/12951
* doc/invoke.texi: Document that
-Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration is not accepted.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.5611&r2=2.5612
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/doc/invoke.texi.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.541&r2=1.542
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12951
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/12951] -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized
2003-11-07 21:45 [Bug driver/12951] New: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-24 23:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-24 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-24 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-24 23:23 -------
Fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12951
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-24 23:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-11-07 21:45 [Bug driver/12951] New: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-08 8:17 ` [Bug c/12951] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-28 9:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-07 14:28 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-09-24 23:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-24 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).