From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17843 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2003 18:24:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17833 invoked by uid 48); 8 Nov 2003 18:24:14 -0000 Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 18:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031108182414.17831.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031108181535.12966.dave@synergy.org> References: <20031108181535.12966.dave@synergy.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/12966] x86 array comparison optimization X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00625.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-08 18:24 ------- The problem is that ada is makes a "call" to memcmp which has to be done with byte wise, so maybe the builtin expand needs to be help to "fix" (help out) for the call to memcmp. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 GCC build triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | GCC target triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | Keywords| |pessimizes-code Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-11-08 18:24:13 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12966