public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing
[not found] <20011125100600.4945.mjw@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
@ 2003-05-26 18:48 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-05-27 19:10 ` mattheww@chiark.greenend.org.uk
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia@physics.uc.edu @ 2003-05-26 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4945
pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu 2003-05-26 18:46 -------
3.1 is an old release, would you mind testing in more recent version of gcc, 3.3?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing
[not found] <20011125100600.4945.mjw@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
2003-05-26 18:48 ` [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing pinskia@physics.uc.edu
@ 2003-05-27 19:10 ` mattheww@chiark.greenend.org.uk
2003-06-02 1:54 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mattheww@chiark.greenend.org.uk @ 2003-05-27 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4945
------- Additional Comments From mattheww@chiark.greenend.org.uk 2003-05-27 18:50 -------
The behaviour is still the same with cvs HEAD from 2003-05-26. Ada-side option
handling has changed, though, so the patch no longer applies. The bogus code in
misc.c is still there.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing
[not found] <20011125100600.4945.mjw@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
2003-05-26 18:48 ` [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-05-27 19:10 ` mattheww@chiark.greenend.org.uk
@ 2003-06-02 1:54 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-11-10 11:38 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-02 1:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4945
dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-06-02 01:54:07
date| |
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-02 01:54 -------
Thanks for the confirmation. If you don't mind updating your patch and sending it to gcc-patches,
that'd be great, but if not, hopefully this'll get fixed one of these days...
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing
[not found] <20011125100600.4945.mjw@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-02 1:54 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-11-10 11:38 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-10 14:32 ` mattheww at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-10 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-10 11:38 -------
I do not see anything 'obviousely' wrong in the current misc.c code,
but -gant is still not handled correctly.
I am not familiar at all with the new way switches are handled in gcc,
so any help/suggestion would be welcome.
Note that the patch for switch.adb should not be needed: the idea is
to rewrite in misc.c -gantxxx as -gnatxxx, so as far as gnat is
concerned, it should only see -gnatxxx switches, and therefore
does not need to recognize -gant everywhere.
Arno
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4945
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing
[not found] <20011125100600.4945.mjw@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-10 11:38 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-10 14:32 ` mattheww at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
2005-02-24 11:28 ` [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failings bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mattheww at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk @ 2003-11-10 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mattheww at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk 2003-11-10 14:32 -------
Indeed, the broken code I quoted has gone now.
With the current code, it looks as if the special-case handing for '-gnatO' will
fail if '-gantO' is passed. Perhaps this one-off spelling correction is more
trouble than it's worth?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mattheww at chiark dot
| |greenend dot org dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4945
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failings
[not found] <20011125100600.4945.mjw@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-10 14:32 ` mattheww at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
@ 2005-02-24 11:28 ` bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-06 21:37 ` [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing bangerth at dealii dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-24 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 21:26 -------
The broken code in misc.c that gave rise to this report is now gone, and frankly, I think it is worth
debating how a misspelled option should be handled. So, I'll change the warning to an error.
-Geert
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Severity|normal |minor
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-24 19:25:53 |2005-02-23 21:26:32
date| |
Summary|Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat'|Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat'
|is failing |is failings
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4945
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing
[not found] <20011125100600.4945.mjw@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-24 11:28 ` [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failings bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-06 21:37 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-04-21 5:02 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-01 22:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2005-03-06 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-03-06 21:37 -------
I think the whole idea of second-guessing what a user might have meant when
he misspelled an option is debatable. I personally am of the opinion that
this should yield an error or a warning, but that we shouldn't attempt to
figure out what she might have meant instead.
But that's only by 2 cents...
W.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat'|Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat'
|is failings |is failing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4945
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing
[not found] <20011125100600.4945.mjw@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-06 21:37 ` [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2005-04-21 5:02 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-01 22:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-21 5:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.0 |4.0.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4945
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing
[not found] <20011125100600.4945.mjw@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-04-21 5:02 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-01 22:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-01 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4945
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing
[not found] <bug-4945-259@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-05 19:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-03 20:11 ` bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-03 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-03 20:10 -------
I think the current behavior of ignoring the option with a warning is fine. I
agree with Wolfgang that If anything, we should remove any processing for this
misspelling. A patch to that effect is welcomed, but this is obviously a very
low priority.
--
bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4945
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing
[not found] <bug-4945-259@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-05 19:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-03 20:11 ` bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-05 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4945
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-03 20:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20011125100600.4945.mjw@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
2003-05-26 18:48 ` [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-05-27 19:10 ` mattheww@chiark.greenend.org.uk
2003-06-02 1:54 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-11-10 11:38 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-10 14:32 ` mattheww at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
2005-02-24 11:28 ` [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failings bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-06 21:37 ` [Bug ada/4945] Rewriting '-gant' as '-gnat' is failing bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-04-21 5:02 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-01 22:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-4945-259@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-05 19:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-03 20:11 ` bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).