From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1504 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2003 20:12:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1453 invoked by uid 48); 18 Nov 2003 20:12:33 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031118201233.1452.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031118001326.13095.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20031118001326.13095.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/13095] GCC accepts invalid using declaration X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg01681.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-11-18 20:12 ------- The code seems illegal, indeed. Here's what icc says: g/x> icc -c x.cc -Xc -ansi x.cc(8): error: invalid base class using B::i; ^ x.cc(9): error: identifier "i" is undefined int foo() { return i; } ^ compilation aborted for x.cc (code 2) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13095