From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11556 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2003 08:37:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11546 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2003 08:37:56 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031126083756.11545.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "davem at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030430161600.10567.davem@redhat.com> References: <20030430161600.10567.davem@redhat.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/10567] -fno-delayed-branch not honored in back-end X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg02319.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From davem at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-26 08:37 ------- The sibcall thing is easy to fix, just turn sibcalls off in the sparc option handling fixup code if -fno-delayed-branch has been specified. No problem retargeting this to 3.5 I also agree with your delay slot indentation consolidation. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10567