public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/13220] New: Cannot overload local operator new and include <iostream>
@ 2003-11-28 18:29 tom at storagematrix dot com
2003-11-28 19:17 ` [Bug c++/13220] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-28 20:38 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tom at storagematrix dot com @ 2003-11-28 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
A conflict exists between a module local overload of operator new and the
definition of operator new that gets dragged in by <iostream>. The following
code fails to compile.
The problem is caused by headers pulled in by <iostream> which can be verified
by commenting out the include of <iostream>.
---- sample2.cpp ----
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <iostream>
//
static void* operator new(size_t size) { malloc(size); }
static void operator delete(void* p) { free(p); }
static void* operator new[](size_t size) { malloc(size); }
static void operator delete[](void* p) { free(p); }
int main(){ return 0; }
---- EOF ----
How-To-Repeat:
$ g++ sample2.cpp -o sample
sample2.cpp: In function `void* operator new(unsigned int)':
sample2.cpp:4: error: `void* operator new(unsigned int)' was declared `extern'
and later `static'
/usr/local/gcc-3.3.2/include/c++/3.3.2/new:82: error: previous declaration of `
void* operator new(unsigned int)'
sample2.cpp: In function `void operator delete(void*)':
sample2.cpp:5: error: `void operator delete(void*)' was declared `extern' and
later `static'
/usr/local/gcc-3.3.2/include/c++/3.3.2/new:84: error: previous declaration of `
void operator delete(void*)'
...,etc.
Workaround:
The problem can be worked around by moving the include of <iostream> until
after the code that overloads operator new and new[]. This won't work if the
overloaded methods need to use <iostream>, however.
--
Summary: Cannot overload local operator new and include
<iostream>
Product: gcc
Version: 3.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tom at storagematrix dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13220
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13220] Cannot overload local operator new and include <iostream>
2003-11-28 18:29 [Bug c++/13220] New: Cannot overload local operator new and include <iostream> tom at storagematrix dot com
@ 2003-11-28 19:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-28 20:38 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-28 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-28 19:17 -------
The header "iostream" pulls in the header "new" which according to c++ standard (18.4) defines
the functions as extern so this is not a bug in gcc.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13220
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13220] Cannot overload local operator new and include <iostream>
2003-11-28 18:29 [Bug c++/13220] New: Cannot overload local operator new and include <iostream> tom at storagematrix dot com
2003-11-28 19:17 ` [Bug c++/13220] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-28 20:38 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2003-11-28 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-11-28 20:38 -------
Subject: Re: New: Cannot overload local operator new and include <iostream>
"tom at storagematrix dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| A conflict exists between a module local overload of operator new
| and the definition of operator new that gets dragged in by
| <iostream>. The following code fails to compile.
And that is to be expected. Put differently, your program makes
unspoken assumptions.
More specifically, the C++ standard allows any standard header
(not inherited from C) to include any other standard header.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13220
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-11-28 20:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-11-28 18:29 [Bug c++/13220] New: Cannot overload local operator new and include <iostream> tom at storagematrix dot com
2003-11-28 19:17 ` [Bug c++/13220] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-28 20:38 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).