From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16467 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2003 21:39:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16460 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2003 21:39:10 -0000 Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 21:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031128213910.16459.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031015120301.12620.jbeulich@novell.com> References: <20031015120301.12620.jbeulich@novell.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/12620] compatibility issue with anonymous struct/union support X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg02536.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-28 21:39 ------- This is done this way because it is the right thing to do as members of the anonymous union are not really members of the ccc but they only act as members just for name lookup reasons. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12620