[Bug c++/3187] gcc-3.0 prerelease lays down two copies of constructors

[Bug c++/3187] gcc-3.0 prerelease lays down two copies of constructors

[pinskia@physics.uc.edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187



------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu  2003-06-01 19:13 -------
There was patch to fix this but it was never approved.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug c++/3187] [3.3/3.4 Regression] gcc-3.0 prerelease lays down two copies of constructors

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|gcc-3.0 prerelease lays down|[3.3/3.4 Regression] gcc-3.0
                   |two copies of constructors  |prerelease lays down two
                   |                            |copies of constructors
   Target Milestone|---                         |3.3.1

[Bug c++/3187] [3.3/3.4 Regression] gcc-3.0 prerelease lays down two copies of constructors

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187



------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-06-24 00:50 -------
simple example:

struct A{A();};
A::A(){}

[Bug c++/3187] [3.3/3.4 Regression] gcc lays down two copies of constructors

[bangerth at dealii dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187



------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-06-24 13:46 -------
See also this thread about multiple entry points:
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-06/msg01985.html

W.

[Bug c++/3187] [3.3/3.4 Regression] gcc lays down two copies of constructors

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187


mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.3.1                       |3.4


------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-06-24 16:23 -------
It would be nice to fix this for 3.4 (by either using multiple entry points, or
something like the Apple patch submitted at one point), but any change that
large would be too much for the 3.3 branch so I've moved the target milestone
for this PR to 3.4.

[Bug c++/3187] [3.3/3.4 Regression] gcc lays down two copies of constructors

[gbburkhardt at aaahawk dot com]

------- Additional Comments From gbburkhardt at aaahawk dot com  2003-11-25 21:42 -------
see also this thread for problems the duplicate constructors cause gdb:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10512

Boy, this one's been open for awhile!!

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187

[Bug c++/3187] [3.3/3.4 Regression] gcc lays down two copies of constructors

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-11-29 01:52 -------
Most likely will not get done for 3.4.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2003-11-09 03:18:14         |2003-11-29 01:52:21
               date|                            |
   Target Milestone|3.4                         |3.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187

[Bug c++/3187] [3.3/3.4 Regression] gcc lays down two copies of constructors

[bangerth at dealii dot org]

------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2004-01-12 17:12 -------
*** Bug 13660 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |Rainer dot Bensch at rsd dot
                   |                            |rohde-schwarz dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187

[Bug c++/3187] [3.3/3.4 Regression] gcc lays down two copies of constructors

[giovannibajo at libero dot it]

------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2004-01-14 03:57 -------
Retargeting to 3.4 - RM must decide.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.5.0                       |3.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187

[Bug c++/3187] [3.3/3.4 Regression] gcc lays down two copies of constructors

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-14 05:31 -------
I really do not know if this really qualifies as a regression as we changed the ABI to something that 
requires this.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187

[Bug c++/3187] gcc lays down two copies of constructors

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-16 18:19 -------
I'm changing this to an enhancement request.

It is, in some sense, a regression -- but it's really a direct consequence of
the new ABI.  

Fixing it will require substantial effort.  I hope that we will get a chance to
do the multiple-entry point stuff -- but it's certainly not going to happen
before GCC 3.4.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
            Summary|[3.3/3.4 Regression] gcc    |gcc lays down two copies of
                   |lays down two copies of     |constructors
                   |constructors                |
   Target Milestone|3.4.0                       |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187

[Bug c++/3187] gcc lays down two copies of constructors

[giovannibajo at libero dot it]

------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2004-01-18 02:45 -------
*** Bug 13725 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rmerkert at alphatech dot
                   |                            |com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187

[Bug c++/3187] gcc lays down two copies of constructors

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |16996
              nThis|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187

[Bug c++/3187] gcc lays down two copies of constructors

[larue at cadence dot com]

------- Additional Comments From larue at cadence dot com  2005-06-15 21:09 -------
This problem makes it difficult to debug C++ code. This is affecting the 
systemC (www.systemc.org) community. It is more than a minor issue those 
debugging C++.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |larue at cadence dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187

[Bug c++/3187] gcc lays down two copies of constructors

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-06-15 21:19 -------
(In reply to comment #17)
> This problem makes it difficult to debug C++ code. This is affecting the 
> systemC (www.systemc.org) community. It is more than a minor issue those 
> debugging C++.
The debuger should be able to handle this as it will also get templates wrong.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187