From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12684 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2003 04:18:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12665 invoked by uid 48); 1 Dec 2003 04:18:55 -0000 Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 04:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031201041855.12663.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030204121601.9567.osv@javad.ru> References: <20030204121601.9567.osv@javad.ru> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/9567] Using struct fields produces worse code than stand-alone vars. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00067.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-01 04:18 ------- It is even worse now on the tree-ssa (extra mr's which is really caused by the register allocator). -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed|2003-11-10 08:14:22 |2003-12-01 04:18:55 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9567