From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14598 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2003 01:04:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14582 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2003 01:04:29 -0000 Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 01:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031203010429.14581.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "wilson at specifixinc dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20021030132600.8407.harrisonrj@ornl.gov> References: <20021030132600.8407.harrisonrj@ornl.gov> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/8407] [IA-64] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:2711 with very simple code X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00326.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2003-12-03 01:04 ------- Subject: Re: [IA-64] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:2711 with very simple code schwab at suse dot de wrote: > But AFAIK it needs to be combined with the patch referenced in comment #11 to > have effect. No, we don't need Richard Sandiford's patch. The comments in #11 were based on a misunderstanding of what Richard's patch did. I just tested a 3.3 cross compiler with my patch hacked in, and it fixed the testcase. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8407