From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24693 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2003 11:30:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24676 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2003 11:30:56 -0000 Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 11:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031204113056.24675.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031025205532.12773.matze@braunis.de> References: <20031025205532.12773.matze@braunis.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/12773] [3.3 Regression] ICE on overladed functions passed as function pointers X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00522.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-12-04 11:30 ------- Subject: Re: [3.3 Regression] ICE on overladed functions passed as function pointers "mark at codesourcery dot com" writes: [...] | > On mainline the bug was fixed by Mark's patch | > | > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-01/msg00713.html | > | > Mark, is there a chance for a backport? | | I wouldn't recommend it, and I don't intend to do a backport, but it's | Gaby's call. If you don't recommand it, I would not play the game :-). Thanks. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12773