public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/13355] New: Suboptimal code generated
@ 2003-12-08 15:12 arjanv at redhat dot com
2003-12-08 15:13 ` [Bug c/13355] " arjanv at redhat dot com
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: arjanv at redhat dot com @ 2003-12-08 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Attached .c file generates quite suboptimal code with tree-ssa including
* excessive stack slot usage
* moving data from a reg to a stack slot and then immediately moving it back to
the same reg
* cltd does not modify EAX so the XOR of eax after that instruction with the
previously-saved value is guaranteed to yield 0 so redundant
--
Summary: Suboptimal code generated
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: arjanv at redhat dot com
CC: dnovillo at redhat dot com,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot
org
GCC build triplet: i686-redhat-linux
GCC host triplet: i686-redhat-linux
GCC target triplet: i686-redhat-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/13355] Suboptimal code generated
2003-12-08 15:12 [Bug c/13355] New: Suboptimal code generated arjanv at redhat dot com
@ 2003-12-08 15:13 ` arjanv at redhat dot com
2003-12-08 16:05 ` [Bug optimization/13355] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: arjanv at redhat dot com @ 2003-12-08 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From arjanv at redhat dot com 2003-12-08 15:13 -------
Created an attachment (id=5301)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5301&action=view)
example .c file that shows behavior with gcc -march=i686 -mtune=i686
-fomit-frame-pointer -O2 test.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/13355] Suboptimal code generated
2003-12-08 15:12 [Bug c/13355] New: Suboptimal code generated arjanv at redhat dot com
2003-12-08 15:13 ` [Bug c/13355] " arjanv at redhat dot com
@ 2003-12-08 16:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-08 16:56 ` [Bug c/13355] " arjanv at redhat dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-08 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-08 16:04 -------
The second one also happens on the mainline:
movl %eax, (%esp)
movl (%esp), %ecx
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c |optimization
Keywords| |pessimizes-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/13355] Suboptimal code generated
2003-12-08 15:12 [Bug c/13355] New: Suboptimal code generated arjanv at redhat dot com
2003-12-08 15:13 ` [Bug c/13355] " arjanv at redhat dot com
2003-12-08 16:05 ` [Bug optimization/13355] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-08 16:56 ` arjanv at redhat dot com
2003-12-08 18:59 ` [Bug optimization/13355] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: arjanv at redhat dot com @ 2003-12-08 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From arjanv at redhat dot com 2003-12-08 16:56 -------
fwiw expected code should be something like:
__asm__ volatile (
" movl (%%ebp), %%eax \n"
" imull %%ebx \n"
" movl %%edx, %%ecx \n"
" movl %%eax, (%%ebp) \n"
" movl %%edx, 8(%%ebp) \n"
" cltd \n"
" xorl %%ecx, %%edx \n"
" setne %%al \n"
" movzbl %%al, %%eax \n"
" movl %%eax, 0x28(%%ebp) \n"
: );
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|optimization |c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/13355] Suboptimal code generated
2003-12-08 15:12 [Bug c/13355] New: Suboptimal code generated arjanv at redhat dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-12-08 16:56 ` [Bug c/13355] " arjanv at redhat dot com
@ 2003-12-08 18:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-08 19:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-08 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c |optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/13355] Suboptimal code generated
2003-12-08 15:12 [Bug c/13355] New: Suboptimal code generated arjanv at redhat dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-12-08 18:59 ` [Bug optimization/13355] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-08 19:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-09 8:43 ` arjanv at redhat dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-08 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-08 19:36 -------
Looks very target specific bugs now and looks like the register allocator is not doing its job.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-12-08 19:36:55
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/13355] Suboptimal code generated
2003-12-08 15:12 [Bug c/13355] New: Suboptimal code generated arjanv at redhat dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-12-08 19:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-09 8:43 ` arjanv at redhat dot com
2003-12-24 5:49 ` kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: arjanv at redhat dot com @ 2003-12-09 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From arjanv at redhat dot com 2003-12-09 08:42 -------
compiling with -fnew-ra actually makes the code worse not better fwiw
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/13355] Suboptimal code generated
2003-12-08 15:12 [Bug c/13355] New: Suboptimal code generated arjanv at redhat dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-12-09 8:43 ` arjanv at redhat dot com
@ 2003-12-24 5:49 ` kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
2003-12-26 4:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: kazu at cs dot umass dot edu @ 2003-12-24 5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2003-12-24 04:16 -------
A reduced testcase for the second case.
On mainline, i686-pc-linux-gnu.
/* -march=i686 -mtune=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 */
register int ebx asm ("ebx");
register int dummy1 asm ("esi");
register int dummy2 asm ("ebp");
int
foo (int arg)
{
long long res = (long long) arg * (long long) ebx;
return (int) res;
}
Global variables take up three registers from IA-32!
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/13355] Suboptimal code generated
2003-12-08 15:12 [Bug c/13355] New: Suboptimal code generated arjanv at redhat dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2003-12-24 5:49 ` kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
@ 2003-12-26 4:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-12 16:39 ` [Bug optimization/13355] Suboptimal code generated with global register variables pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-29 1:55 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/13355] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-26 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/13355] Suboptimal code generated with global register variables
2003-12-08 15:12 [Bug c/13355] New: Suboptimal code generated arjanv at redhat dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2003-12-26 4:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-12 16:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-29 1:55 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/13355] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-12 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-12 16:39 -------
This is related to bug 12395 which might get fixed when that gets fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |12395
Summary|Suboptimal code generated |Suboptimal code generated
| |with global register
| |variables
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/13355] Suboptimal code generated with global register variables
2003-12-08 15:12 [Bug c/13355] New: Suboptimal code generated arjanv at redhat dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-12 16:39 ` [Bug optimization/13355] Suboptimal code generated with global register variables pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-29 1:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-29 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-29 01:55 -------
Some of this is already fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-29 1:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-08 15:12 [Bug c/13355] New: Suboptimal code generated arjanv at redhat dot com
2003-12-08 15:13 ` [Bug c/13355] " arjanv at redhat dot com
2003-12-08 16:05 ` [Bug optimization/13355] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-08 16:56 ` [Bug c/13355] " arjanv at redhat dot com
2003-12-08 18:59 ` [Bug optimization/13355] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-08 19:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-09 8:43 ` arjanv at redhat dot com
2003-12-24 5:49 ` kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
2003-12-26 4:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-12 16:39 ` [Bug optimization/13355] Suboptimal code generated with global register variables pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-29 1:55 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/13355] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).