public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "janis187 at us dot ibm dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug preprocessor/13046] [3.3/3.4 Regression] -traditional-cpp rejects valid code
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 23:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031208231415.12956.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031114031823.13046.n8gray@caltech.edu>
------- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2003-12-08 23:14 -------
The regression in PR 13046 was introduced or exposed with this patch:
2002-06-28 Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
PR preprocessor/7138
* cpplib.c (_cpp_handle_directive): Do traditional
preparation after setting state.angled_headers.
* cpptrad.c (scan_out_logical_line): Fix potential
quote bug.
The regression hunt took place on i686-pc-linux-gnu using the small
test case from comment #2, but is confirmed with the original test
case whose output before the patch (blank lines removed) is:
# 1 "13046_orig.c"
# 1 "<built-in>"
# 1 "<command line>"# 1 "<built-in>"
# 1 "<command line>"
# 1 "13046_orig.c"
13046_orig.c:2: warning: #warning Defining two-argument macros
and right after the patch is:
# 1 "13046_orig.c"
# 1 "<built-in>"
# 1 "<command line>"
# 1 "13046_orig.c"
13046_orig.c:2: warning: #warning Defining two-argument macros
13046_orig.c:7: macro "btodb" requires 2 arguments, but only 1 given
13046_orig.c:8: macro "dbtob" requires 2 arguments, but only 1 given
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |neil at daikokuya dot co dot
| |uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13046
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-08 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-14 3:18 [Bug preprocessor/13046] New: cannot use #ifdef __APPLE__ on Darwin n8gray at caltech dot edu
2003-11-14 5:23 ` [Bug preprocessor/13046] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-15 2:44 ` [Bug preprocessor/13046] [3.3 Regression] -traditional-cpp rejects valid code pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-08 23:14 ` janis187 at us dot ibm dot com [this message]
2003-12-11 22:04 ` [Bug preprocessor/13046] [3.3/3.4 " neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-12 7:08 ` neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-12 7:13 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-31 3:15 ` [Bug preprocessor/13046] [3.3 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-15 12:36 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-12 21:12 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-13 15:05 ` neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
2004-04-18 18:17 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031208231415.12956.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).