public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000
[not found] <20020730073601.7443.ddolson@sandvine.com>
@ 2003-06-02 3:54 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-06-02 23:21 ` echristo@redhat.com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-02 3:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |echristo@redhat.com
GCC build triplet| |i686-pc-cygwin
GCC host triplet| |i686-pc-cygwin
GCC target triplet| |mips-wrs-vxworks
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-02 03:54 -------
Eric,
here's another MIPS report that seems rather old. Any comments on it? Thanks,
Dara
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000
[not found] <20020730073601.7443.ddolson@sandvine.com>
2003-06-02 3:54 ` [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000 dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-06-02 23:21 ` echristo@redhat.com
2003-06-03 2:20 ` ddolson@sandvine.com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: echristo@redhat.com @ 2003-06-02 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
------- Additional Comments From echristo@redhat.com 2003-06-02 23:21 -------
Subject: Re: [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes
arithmetic containing 0x80000000
On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 20:54, dhazeghi@yahoo.com wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
>
> here's another MIPS report that seems rather old. Any comments on it? Thanks,
Code generation is now sufficiently different that I think it can move
to closed. It appears to work in current sources, though an executable
testcase would have been ideal and I didn't want to run this through a
tester.
-eric
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000
[not found] <20020730073601.7443.ddolson@sandvine.com>
2003-06-02 3:54 ` [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000 dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-06-02 23:21 ` echristo@redhat.com
@ 2003-06-03 2:20 ` ddolson@sandvine.com
2003-06-03 10:30 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ddolson@sandvine.com @ 2003-06-03 2:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
------- Additional Comments From ddolson@sandvine.com 2003-06-03 02:20 -------
Subject: RE: [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arit
hmetic containing 0x80000000
Eric,
Are you asking for a test case, e.g., a complete program, which returns
true/false indicating code correctness?
Dave.
-----Original Message-----
From: echristo@redhat.com
To: ddolson@sandvine.com
Sent: 6/2/2003 7:21 PM
Subject: [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic
containing 0x80000000
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT*
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
------- Additional Comments From echristo@redhat.com 2003-06-02 23:21
-------
Subject: Re: [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes
arithmetic containing 0x80000000
On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 20:54, dhazeghi@yahoo.com wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT*
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
>
> here's another MIPS report that seems rather old. Any comments on it?
Thanks,
Code generation is now sufficiently different that I think it can move
to closed. It appears to work in current sources, though an executable
testcase would have been ideal and I didn't want to run this through a
tester.
-eric
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000
[not found] <20020730073601.7443.ddolson@sandvine.com>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-03 2:20 ` ddolson@sandvine.com
@ 2003-06-03 10:30 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-06-03 12:15 ` ddolson@sandvine.com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-03 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-03 10:30 -------
Yes. Any short example demonstrating the problem either in assembly, or at
runtime, should be sufficient. Thanks,
Dara
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000
[not found] <20020730073601.7443.ddolson@sandvine.com>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-03 10:30 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-06-03 12:15 ` ddolson@sandvine.com
2003-06-03 17:36 ` echristo@redhat.com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ddolson@sandvine.com @ 2003-06-03 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
------- Additional Comments From ddolson@sandvine.com 2003-06-03 12:15 -------
Subject: RE: [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arit
hmetic containing 0x80000000
The bug report already has short examples. If desired for regression test,
compare the result of good_fn1() to bad_fn1(), bad_fn2(), bad_fn3() for
integers in a variety of corner-cases.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:31 AM
> To: ddolson@sandvine.com
> Subject: [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes
> arithmetic containing 0x80000000
>
>
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT*
> gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com
> 2003-06-03 10:30 -------
> Yes. Any short example demonstrating the problem either in
> assembly, or at
> runtime, should be sufficient. Thanks,
>
> Dara
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000
[not found] <20020730073601.7443.ddolson@sandvine.com>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-03 12:15 ` ddolson@sandvine.com
@ 2003-06-03 17:36 ` echristo@redhat.com
2003-06-03 18:49 ` ddolson@sandvine.com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: echristo@redhat.com @ 2003-06-03 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
------- Additional Comments From echristo@redhat.com 2003-06-03 17:36 -------
Subject: Re: [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes
arithmetic containing 0x80000000
> ------- Additional Comments From ddolson@sandvine.com 2003-06-03 12:15 -------
> Subject: RE: [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arit
> hmetic containing 0x80000000
>
> The bug report already has short examples. If desired for regression test,
> compare the result of good_fn1() to bad_fn1(), bad_fn2(), bad_fn3() for
> integers in a variety of corner-cases.
>
Actually, as I wrote, it doesn't look like a problem any more. Give it a
shot.
-eric
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000
[not found] <20020730073601.7443.ddolson@sandvine.com>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-03 17:36 ` echristo@redhat.com
@ 2003-06-03 18:49 ` ddolson@sandvine.com
2003-06-03 19:41 ` echristo@redhat.com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ddolson@sandvine.com @ 2003-06-03 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
------- Additional Comments From ddolson@sandvine.com 2003-06-03 18:49 -------
Subject: RE: [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arit
hmetic containing 0x80000000
It isn't clear which version has the fix. As Dara points out below, it
doesn't compile on 3.2.3 or 3.3.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dara Hazeghi [mailto:dhazeghi@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 3:06 PM
> To: Dave Dolson
> Subject: RE: target/7443: [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes
> arithmeti c containing 0x80000000
>
>
>
> --- Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com> wrote:
> > I don't recall if the problem occured at -O0.
> > I'll look at the asm if you wish.
>
> Okay, the story gets weirder. This ICEs on gcc 3.2.3,
> 3.3 and mainline. I'm guessing that's because I'm
> using the target mips-elf. You're system is
> mips-vxworks, right?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dara
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000
[not found] <20020730073601.7443.ddolson@sandvine.com>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-03 18:49 ` ddolson@sandvine.com
@ 2003-06-03 19:41 ` echristo@redhat.com
2003-08-22 9:34 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-09 17:26 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
9 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: echristo@redhat.com @ 2003-06-03 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
------- Additional Comments From echristo@redhat.com 2003-06-03 19:41 -------
Subject: Re: [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes
arithmetic containing 0x80000000
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 11:49, ddolson@sandvine.com wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From ddolson@sandvine.com 2003-06-03 18:49 -------
> Subject: RE: [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arit
> hmetic containing 0x80000000
>
> It isn't clear which version has the fix. As Dara points out below, it
> doesn't compile on 3.2.3 or 3.3.
I used mainline.
-eric
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000
[not found] <20020730073601.7443.ddolson@sandvine.com>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-03 19:41 ` echristo@redhat.com
@ 2003-08-22 9:34 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-09 17:26 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
9 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-22 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-22 09:34 -------
No further feedback. Testcase seems to work correctly with CVS head.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000
[not found] <20020730073601.7443.ddolson@sandvine.com>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-22 9:34 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-09 17:26 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
9 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-12-09 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-09 17:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20020730073601.7443.ddolson@sandvine.com>
2003-06-02 3:54 ` [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000 dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-06-02 23:21 ` echristo@redhat.com
2003-06-03 2:20 ` ddolson@sandvine.com
2003-06-03 10:30 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-06-03 12:15 ` ddolson@sandvine.com
2003-06-03 17:36 ` echristo@redhat.com
2003-06-03 18:49 ` ddolson@sandvine.com
2003-06-03 19:41 ` echristo@redhat.com
2003-08-22 9:34 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-09 17:26 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).