public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libgcj/9026] [win32] libjava confuses Eclipse SWT (os.arch)
[not found] <20021220070632.9026.oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
@ 2003-08-05 19:59 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-08-05 22:34 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-09 17:46 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-08-05 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9026
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-08-05 19:59:15
date| |
Summary|Gcj -Os option confuses |[win32] libjava confuses
|Eclipse SWT |Eclipse SWT (os.arch)
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-08-05 19:59 -------
I can confirm the code has not changed as still on win32, libjava does not set os.arch to
x86:
#ifdef HAVE_UNAME
struct utsname u;
if (! uname (&u))
{
SET ("os.name", u.sysname);
SET ("os.arch", u.machine);
SET ("os.version", u.release);
}
else
{
SET ("os.name", "unknown");
SET ("os.arch", "unknown");
SET ("os.version", "unknown");
}
#endif /* HAVE_UNAME */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/9026] [win32] libjava confuses Eclipse SWT (os.arch)
[not found] <20021220070632.9026.oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
2003-08-05 19:59 ` [Bug libgcj/9026] [win32] libjava confuses Eclipse SWT (os.arch) pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2003-08-05 22:34 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-09 17:46 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-05 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9026
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-05 22:34 -------
Actually, I think this is fixed on the trunk.
See this patch:
2003-07-26 Ranjit Mathew <rmathew@hotmail.com>
* win32.cc (_Jv_platform_initProperties): Use generic names
like "x86" for the "os.arch" property to be consistent with
what Sun's JDK produces. Use the wProcessorArchitecture
member of the Win32 SYSTEM_INFO structure, filled in a call
to GetSystemInfo( ), instead of dwProcessorType.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/9026] [win32] libjava confuses Eclipse SWT (os.arch)
[not found] <20021220070632.9026.oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
2003-08-05 19:59 ` [Bug libgcj/9026] [win32] libjava confuses Eclipse SWT (os.arch) pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-08-05 22:34 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-09 17:46 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-12-09 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9026
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-09 17:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20021220070632.9026.oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
2003-08-05 19:59 ` [Bug libgcj/9026] [win32] libjava confuses Eclipse SWT (os.arch) pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-08-05 22:34 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-09 17:46 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).