From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24034 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2003 18:01:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24017 invoked by uid 48); 9 Dec 2003 18:01:13 -0000 Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 18:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031209180113.24015.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "kbowers at lanl dot gov" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031105013127.12902.kbowers@lanl.gov> References: <20031105013127.12902.kbowers@lanl.gov> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/12902] Invalid assembly generated when using SSE / xmmintrin.h X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg01124.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From kbowers at lanl dot gov 2003-12-09 18:01 ------- Over a month ago, I reported this bug and then went to the effort to learning gcc's internals in order to submit patches. However, the bug is still listed as new and there has been no response for roughly a month. Will these patches (or some other fix) be incorporated into a future release of gcc? The reason I ask is it is unreasonable for me to require users to both patch and build their own compiler to install some scientific codes of mine on large clusters. I would like to see this bug resolved quickly so I can continue to recommend gcc as the preferred compiler. Given I've already submitted patches, this should be easy to address. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12902