From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24115 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2003 21:34:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24086 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2003 21:34:03 -0000 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031212213403.24084.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030306014600.9972.david.billinghurst@riotinto.com> References: <20030306014600.9972.david.billinghurst@riotinto.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/9972] [3.4 regression] Failure of g77.f-torture/execute/980520-1.f X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg01455.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2003-12-12 21:33 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] Failure of g77.f-torture/execute/980520-1.f steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-12 01:35 ------- > Attached a patch, but: > - It's a bit hackish > - It needs more testing. > > The full plan of removing flag_inline_trees and flag_really_no_inline is just > not going to work for 3.4, I never got any patch to properly preserve our > current obfuscated semantics of these flags. This will have to do for 3.4 if > it is acceptable. 1. The cfglayout part of the patch is not part of this solution. 2. The other part needs the approval of global write maintainer. I don't object - I just hope this mess gets solved until such time as we switch to gfortran ... Cheers, -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9972