public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/13396] New: exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack
@ 2003-12-13 23:20 bim2003 at basistech dot com
  2003-12-13 23:22 ` [Bug c++/13396] " bim2003 at basistech dot com
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bim2003 at basistech dot com @ 2003-12-13 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

A C++ program defines an extern "C" function. It then calls a C function, which 
in turn calls the extern "C" function. The extern "C" function throws. 
A 'catch' block in the original fails to catch the exception.

-- 
           Summary: exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.2.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: bim2003 at basistech dot com
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13396


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/13396] exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack
  2003-12-13 23:20 [Bug c++/13396] New: exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack bim2003 at basistech dot com
@ 2003-12-13 23:22 ` bim2003 at basistech dot com
  2003-12-16 23:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bim2003 at basistech dot com @ 2003-12-13 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bim2003 at basistech dot com  2003-12-13 23:22 -------
Created an attachment (id=5328)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5328&action=view)
Sample that demonstrates the problem.

The example builds both a dlopen test bed and a plain, statically-linked,
version. The problem can be demonstrated by running 'make' and then running
'sdriver', the statically linked example.

All this was experienced with glibc 2.2.5-44, however the relevant code seems
to live in libgcc, so that glibc should not be an issue.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13396


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/13396] exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack
  2003-12-13 23:20 [Bug c++/13396] New: exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack bim2003 at basistech dot com
  2003-12-13 23:22 ` [Bug c++/13396] " bim2003 at basistech dot com
@ 2003-12-16 23:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-17 15:29 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-16 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-16 22:53 -------
Not a bug, compile the c file with -fexceptions.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13396


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/13396] exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack
  2003-12-13 23:20 [Bug c++/13396] New: exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack bim2003 at basistech dot com
  2003-12-13 23:22 ` [Bug c++/13396] " bim2003 at basistech dot com
  2003-12-16 23:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-17 15:29 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
  2003-12-17 16:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2003-12-17 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-12-17 11:19 -------
I believe I checked this before, and it didn't help. Andrew, 
did you actually test this? 
 
W. 

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13396


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/13396] exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack
  2003-12-13 23:20 [Bug c++/13396] New: exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack bim2003 at basistech dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-12-17 15:29 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2003-12-17 16:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-17 16:58 ` bim2003 at basistech dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-17 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-17 16:30 -------
Still invalid, the code contains: extern void do_something() throw(); which tells gcc that it cannot 
throw anything usefull and if it does throw, then gcc has to abort.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13396


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/13396] exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack
  2003-12-13 23:20 [Bug c++/13396] New: exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack bim2003 at basistech dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-12-17 16:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-17 16:58 ` bim2003 at basistech dot com
  2003-12-18 18:51 ` bim2003 at basistech dot com
  2003-12-19  9:43 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bim2003 at basistech dot com @ 2003-12-17 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bim2003 at basistech dot com  2003-12-17 16:48 -------
Subject: RE:  exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack

Arggh. I thought throw() meant 'can throw anything', not 'can't throw
anything useful'.

-----Original Message-----
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 11:30 AM
To: Benson Margulies
Subject: [Bug c++/13396] exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack



------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-17 16:30 ------- Still invalid, the code contains: extern void
do_something() throw(); which tells gcc that it cannot 
throw anything usefull and if it does throw, then gcc has to abort.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13396

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13396


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/13396] exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack
  2003-12-13 23:20 [Bug c++/13396] New: exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack bim2003 at basistech dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-12-17 16:58 ` bim2003 at basistech dot com
@ 2003-12-18 18:51 ` bim2003 at basistech dot com
  2003-12-19  9:43 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bim2003 at basistech dot com @ 2003-12-18 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bim2003 at basistech dot com  2003-12-18 18:39 -------
Subject: RE:  exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack

GCC 3.2.3 does not have throw(...). So, is that the default, and throw()
asserts 'no throws here'?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13396


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/13396] exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack
  2003-12-13 23:20 [Bug c++/13396] New: exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack bim2003 at basistech dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-12-18 18:51 ` bim2003 at basistech dot com
@ 2003-12-19  9:43 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2003-12-19  9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-12-19 08:49 -------
throw() means: this function doesn't throw anything. If it does, 
then this is converted to a call to terminate. throw(...) is the same 
as if you don't specify anything, i.e.: this function can throw anything. 
 
W. 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13396


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-19  8:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-13 23:20 [Bug c++/13396] New: exceptions disrupted by C in the call stack bim2003 at basistech dot com
2003-12-13 23:22 ` [Bug c++/13396] " bim2003 at basistech dot com
2003-12-16 23:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-17 15:29 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-12-17 16:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-17 16:58 ` bim2003 at basistech dot com
2003-12-18 18:51 ` bim2003 at basistech dot com
2003-12-19  9:43 ` bangerth at dealii dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).