From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-79056-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1221 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2003 00:33:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1202 invoked by uid 48); 17 Dec 2003 00:33:26 -0000
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:39:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20031217003326.1197.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20021226065600.9059.stefaandr@hotmail.com>
References: <20021226065600.9059.stefaandr@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug optimization/9059] unused arrays not optimized away
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg01733.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-17 00:33 -------
Weird:
The testcase:
f()
{
  int a[1024];
}
is not optimized but the testcase is:
f()
{
  int a[1024];
  a[0]=0;
}

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|SUSPENDED                   |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|2003-12-04 09:07:42         |2003-12-17 00:33:25
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9059