From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1531 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2003 14:05:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1520 invoked by uid 48); 18 Dec 2003 14:05:29 -0000 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031218140529.1519.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030304160600.9941.struppi@acm.org> References: <20030304160600.9941.struppi@acm.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/9941] [non-weak] typeinfo not generated correctly when #pragmas are involved X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg01917.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-12-18 14:05 ------- Sorry if I sounded rude -- it is just a fact that we are developer starved and that we need to focus on what our priorities are. That's why we don't make promises as to when a bug is going to be fixed. You can increase your chances of a bug getting fixed by paying someone to do it, though. Another way is to provide as small a testcase as possible and/or show that this is a regression. W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9941