From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2070 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2003 17:29:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2053 invoked by uid 48); 18 Dec 2003 17:29:56 -0000 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031218172956.2052.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030926105501.12419.aph@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20030926105501.12419.aph@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/12419] [3.3/3.4 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg01929.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-18 17:29 ------- The bug is still present on mainline... (cc1 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer-march=i686 -mtune=i686 ): foo: pushl %ebx subl $8, %esp movl a, %ebx call f movl a, %eax addl $8, %esp addl %eax, %ebx movl %ebx, %eax popl %ebx ret Just for fun, here's what tree-ssa makes of it foo: pushl %ebx subl $8, %esp movl a, %ebx call f addl $8, %esp leal (%ebx,%ebx), %eax popl %ebx ret -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed|2003-09-27 06:36:21 |2003-12-18 17:29:55 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12419