From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27569 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2003 11:56:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27561 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2003 11:56:11 -0000 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031219115611.27560.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "jan-jaap dot vanderheijden at phoenixbv dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031219105914.13442.jan-jaap.vanderheijden@phoenixbv.com> References: <20031219105914.13442.jan-jaap.vanderheijden@phoenixbv.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/13442] Compiler crash in gnatlib bootstrap, SIGBUS at s-soflin.ads:145:4 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg02066.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jan-jaap dot vanderheijden at phoenixbv dot com 2003-12-19 11:56 ------- Subject: Re: Compiler crash in gnatlib bootstrap, SIGBUS at s-soflin.ads:145:4 Sorry, pressed "send" to fast... > > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-19 > 11:32 ------- What GNAT version are you starting out with, there are some > known bugs for mips with older Ada compilers, see PR 6669 and bug 6552? OK, I gave it two tries: 1) bootstrap native using gnat-3.14, which was in turn built from 3.13 <-- 3.12 <-- 3.11 (which is the last public binary) This was very tedious, and fails as detailed in the bugreport. 2) build a crosscompiler, target mips-sgi-irix6.5, host x86/debian-3.0. This is a new possibility, now that mips-sgi-irix6.5 is a binutils target. I'm using gcc-3.3.2 + gnat as my x86 compiler to build the gcc-3.4-031218 snapshot cross(gcc+gnat), then use this to crossbuild the native mips-sgi-irix6.5 gcc+gnat. Then use this to bootstrap-build a native snapshot gcc compiler on irix. This failed in the "native bootstrap" part, in the same location (s-soflin.ads:145:4). On 19 Dec 2003 11:32:15 -0000 "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" wrote: > In bug 6669, there is references to binaries which should work but do not > overload his machine. Can you try them and say if they work because the report > in PR 6669 is that they work. I'll give this a try. Jan-Jaap -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13442