From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-79499-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24702 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2003 07:40:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24689 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2003 07:40:21 -0000
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 08:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20031220074021.24688.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "stl at caltech dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20031109014258.12974.stl@caltech.edu>
References: <20031109014258.12974.stl@caltech.edu>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/12974] gcc-3.4-20031105 bootstrap failure [MinGW]
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg02176.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From stl at caltech dot edu  2003-12-20 07:40 -------
Shouldn't this be considered a 3.4.0 regression, since I can bootstrap 3.3.2 
fine?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12974