From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6534 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2003 14:10:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6523 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2003 14:10:49 -0000 Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 16:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031220141049.6522.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030522192332.10944.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20030522192332.10944.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/10944] alloc_page in ggc-page.c is slow X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg02201.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-20 14:10 ------- I have experimented with my patch on three different targets (i686,x86_64, and hpux) and have never seen any improvements with it even though it kills the supposed hot spot in the code. I'm marking this as WAITING and I'll close it soonish, unless someone can test this on the reporter's platform (ppc-darwin) and show that it does help on that target. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10944