From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-79803-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8843 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2003 14:53:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8836 invoked by uid 48); 23 Dec 2003 14:53:09 -0000
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:10:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20031223145309.8835.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20031223145058.13479.giovannibajo@libero.it>
References: <20031223145058.13479.giovannibajo@libero.it>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug optimization/13479] [3.4 regression] 20-30% compile-time regression with template-heavy code
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg02480.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2003-12-23 14:53 -------
Created an attachment (id=5361)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5361&action=view)
Preprocessed source for G++ 3.2


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13479