From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11206 invoked by alias); 24 Dec 2003 21:55:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11199 invoked by uid 48); 24 Dec 2003 21:55:57 -0000 Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 22:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031224215557.11198.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "kazu at cs dot umass dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031004182021.12508.gpiez@users.sourceforge.net> References: <20031004182021.12508.gpiez@users.sourceforge.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/12508] weak optimization for some constants < 2^16 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg02597.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2003-12-24 21:55 ------- With current 3.4 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer, I get For 0x1fff0 xorl %eax, %eax testl $131056, 4(%esp) setne %al ret For 0xfff0 xorl %eax, %eax testl $65520, 4(%esp) setne %al ret -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kazu at cs dot umass dot edu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12508