* [Bug libgcj/11899] java.net.URI class not yet implemented
2003-08-13 1:43 [Bug libgcj/11899] New: java.net.URI class not yet implemented bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
@ 2003-08-13 1:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-13 1:58 ` bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-13 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11899
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-08-13 01:49:20
date| |
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-13 01:49 -------
I can confirm that the source file, java/net/URI.java, functions are empty (aka just stubs).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/11899] java.net.URI class not yet implemented
2003-08-13 1:43 [Bug libgcj/11899] New: java.net.URI class not yet implemented bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
2003-08-13 1:49 ` [Bug libgcj/11899] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-13 1:58 ` bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
2003-08-23 1:17 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz @ 2003-08-13 1:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11899
bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |11900
nThis| |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/11899] java.net.URI class not yet implemented
2003-08-13 1:43 [Bug libgcj/11899] New: java.net.URI class not yet implemented bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
2003-08-13 1:49 ` [Bug libgcj/11899] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-13 1:58 ` bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
@ 2003-08-23 1:17 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-10-22 22:18 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-08-23 1:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11899
dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.4 |---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/11899] java.net.URI class not yet implemented
2003-08-13 1:43 [Bug libgcj/11899] New: java.net.URI class not yet implemented bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-23 1:17 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2003-10-22 22:18 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-25 20:49 ` konqueror at gmx dot de
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-22 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11899
------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-22 22:12 -------
FYI, this is pending reassignment of gnu.regexp.
Once that occurs (it is in progress, ask Mark Wielaard
for updates), we've got a version of java.util.regex
and URI that we can use.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/11899] java.net.URI class not yet implemented
2003-08-13 1:43 [Bug libgcj/11899] New: java.net.URI class not yet implemented bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-22 22:18 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-25 20:49 ` konqueror at gmx dot de
2004-04-01 13:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-27 5:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: konqueror at gmx dot de @ 2003-12-25 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2003-12-25 18:23 -------
When java.net.URI gets implement the java.io.File patch needs to be
commited too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11899
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/11899] java.net.URI class not yet implemented
2003-08-13 1:43 [Bug libgcj/11899] New: java.net.URI class not yet implemented bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-12-25 20:49 ` konqueror at gmx dot de
@ 2004-04-01 13:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-27 5:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-01 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2003-08-13 01:49:20 |2004-04-01 13:54:27
date| |
Target Milestone|--- |3.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11899
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/11899] java.net.URI class not yet implemented
2003-08-13 1:43 [Bug libgcj/11899] New: java.net.URI class not yet implemented bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-04-01 13:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-04-27 5:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-27 5:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-27 04:44 -------
Fixed for 3.5.0.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11899
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread