* [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
[not found] <20010826094601.4131.k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp>
@ 2003-12-28 23:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-20 18:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-28 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-28 22:40 -------
Suspending as this will take a major change in the C++ front-end.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
Keywords| |pessimizes-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
[not found] <20010826094601.4131.k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp>
2003-12-28 23:05 ` [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section? pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-20 18:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-20 18:57 ` pluto at agmk dot net
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-20 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20 18:44 -------
*** Bug 22575 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
[not found] <20010826094601.4131.k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp>
2003-12-28 23:05 ` [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section? pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-20 18:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-20 18:57 ` pluto at agmk dot net
2005-07-20 19:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pluto at agmk dot net @ 2005-07-20 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-07-20 18:53 -------
hmm, i think someone should reopen this bug.
4.1 is a good place for major changes in c++ front-end ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
[not found] <20010826094601.4131.k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-20 18:57 ` pluto at agmk dot net
@ 2005-07-20 19:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-20 19:04 ` schlie at comcast dot net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-20 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20 18:58 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> hmm, i think someone should reopen this bug.
> 4.1 is a good place for major changes in c++ front-end ;)
Not any more since we are in stage3 already.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
[not found] <20010826094601.4131.k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-20 19:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-20 19:04 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2005-07-20 19:12 ` Andrew Pinski
2005-07-20 19:26 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2005-07-20 19:47 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
6 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: schlie at comcast dot net @ 2005-07-20 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-07-20 19:03 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > hmm, i think someone should reopen this bug.
> > 4.1 is a good place for major changes in c++ front-end ;)
> Not any more since we are in stage3 already.
- given that 4.1's front end has already evolved from that in 2.95,
it's not clear that a conclusion based on 2.95 is even valid for 4.1.
(so should no likely assumed as being so).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
2005-07-20 19:04 ` schlie at comcast dot net
@ 2005-07-20 19:12 ` Andrew Pinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2005-07-20 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugzilla; +Cc: gcc-bugs
On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:03 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
> - given that 4.1's front end has already evolved from that in 2.95,
> it's not clear that a conclusion based on 2.95 is even valid for
> 4.1.
> (so should no likely assumed as being so).
It still is true since the front-end still does exactly what it did in
2.95 for
this testcase and there have been no changes in this area really.
Since the mainline is in stage3 which means no more improvements except
for fixing
bugs which are either regressions or non enhancement bugs.
-- Pinski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
[not found] <20010826094601.4131.k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-20 19:04 ` schlie at comcast dot net
@ 2005-07-20 19:26 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2005-07-20 19:47 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2005-07-20 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-20 19:11 -------
Subject: Re: Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:03 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
> - given that 4.1's front end has already evolved from that in 2.95,
> it's not clear that a conclusion based on 2.95 is even valid for
> 4.1.
> (so should no likely assumed as being so).
It still is true since the front-end still does exactly what it did in
2.95 for
this testcase and there have been no changes in this area really.
Since the mainline is in stage3 which means no more improvements except
for fixing
bugs which are either regressions or non enhancement bugs.
-- Pinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
[not found] <20010826094601.4131.k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-20 19:26 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2005-07-20 19:47 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2005-07-20 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-20 19:47 -------
It may be true that this bug isn't going to be fixed in this cycle,
but there's no reason not to keep it open instead of suspending it.
The "suspend" state is mean for PRs where we need external things to
happen, such as a defect report to be accepted. This clearly isn't the
case here.
I'll close this PR and reopen 22575 instead.
W.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22575 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread