public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/13526] New: Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined
@ 2003-12-30 21:20 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-30 21:42 ` [Bug optimization/13526] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-30 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

At the end of stage 3, the following 
./xgcc -B./ -B/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-3.4/hppa-linux/bin/ -isystem /home/dave
/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-3.4/hppa-linux/include -isystem /home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-3.4/
hppa-linux/sys-include -L/home/dave/gcc-3.4/objdir/gcc/../ld -O2  -DIN_GCC    -W
 -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-defi
nition  -isystem ./include  -fPIC -DELF=1 -DLINUX=1 -g -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_
LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED  -I. -I -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../gcc/gcc/ -I../.
./gcc/gcc/../include   -DL_gcov -c ../../gcc/gcc/libgcov.c -o libgcc/./_gcov.o
/tmp/cc9LdwAF.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cc9LdwAF.s:162: Error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined
/tmp/cc9LdwAF.s:218: Error: symbol `.LFE0' is already defined
/tmp/cc9LdwAF.s:223: Error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined
/tmp/cc9LdwAF.s:285: Error: symbol `.LFE0' is already defined
/tmp/cc9LdwAF.s:289: Error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined
/tmp/cc9LdwAF.s:364: Error: symbol `.LFE0' is already defined
...

The previous build on 12/29/03 was successful.  Doing a comparison
of .o files, I find many differences between stage 2 and 3.

dave@gsyprf11:~/gcc-3.4/objdir/gcc$ for i in *.o; do cmp $i stage2/$i;done
alias.o stage2/alias.o differ: char 36, line 1
bb-reorder.o stage2/bb-reorder.o differ: char 36, line 1
bt-load.o stage2/bt-load.o differ: char 35, line 1
builtins.o stage2/builtins.o differ: char 36, line 1
...

-- 
           Summary: Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P2
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/13526] [3.4 Regression] Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined
  2003-12-30 21:20 [Bug c/13526] New: Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-30 21:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-30 22:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-30 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|c                           |optimization
           Keywords|                            |build, wrong-code
            Summary|Assembler error: symbol     |[3.4 Regression] Assembler
                   |`.LFB0' is already defined  |error: symbol `.LFB0' is
                   |                            |already defined
   Target Milestone|---                         |3.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/13526] [3.4 Regression] Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined
  2003-12-30 21:20 [Bug c/13526] New: Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-30 21:42 ` [Bug optimization/13526] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-30 22:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-30 22:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-30 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-30 21:15 -------
What is the changelog that is on the top of the file changeLog?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/13526] [3.4 Regression] Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined
  2003-12-30 21:20 [Bug c/13526] New: Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-30 21:42 ` [Bug optimization/13526] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-30 22:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-30 22:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-30 22:34 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
  2003-12-31 16:03 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-30 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-30 21:20 -------
The only changes between then and now which could have any effect:
2003-12-30  Steven Bosscher  <steven@gcc.gnu.org>
        
        Backport from tree-ssa (relevant changes only):
        2003-12-18  Zdenek Dvorak  <rakdver@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
        
        * et-forest.h :....
       .....

2003-12-29  Roger Sayle  <roger@eyesopen.com>

        PR fortran/12632
        * fold-const.c (fold) <COND_EXPR>: Don't fold a constant condition,
        if the type of the selected branch doesn't match its' parent.

2003-12-30  Roger Sayle  <roger@eyesopen.com>
        
        * fold-const.c (fold) <COND_EXPR>: Don't require strict type
        equality, instead just prevent replacing a COND_EXPR of non-void
        type by one of its operands of void type.

And that is it.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/13526] [3.4 Regression] Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined
  2003-12-30 21:20 [Bug c/13526] New: Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-12-30 22:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-30 22:34 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
  2003-12-31 16:03 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2003-12-30 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2003-12-30 22:10 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] Assembler error: symbol

> 2003-12-30  Steven Bosscher  <steven@gcc.gnu.org>
>         
>         Backport from tree-ssa (relevant changes only):
>         2003-12-18  Zdenek Dvorak  <rakdver@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
>         
>         * et-forest.h :....

I currently doing builds to see if Steven's patch is the culprit.  If
that's not it, I will try the others.

> 2003-12-29  Roger Sayle  <roger@eyesopen.com>
> 
>         PR fortran/12632
>         * fold-const.c (fold) <COND_EXPR>: Don't fold a constant condition,
>         if the type of the selected branch doesn't match its' parent.
> 
> 2003-12-30  Roger Sayle  <roger@eyesopen.com>
>         
>         * fold-const.c (fold) <COND_EXPR>: Don't require strict type
>         equality, instead just prevent replacing a COND_EXPR of non-void
>         type by one of its operands of void type.
> 
> And that is it.

Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/13526] [3.4 Regression] Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined
  2003-12-30 21:20 [Bug c/13526] New: Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-12-30 22:34 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2003-12-31 16:03 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-31 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-31 15:05 -------
Can't duplicate problem.  I probably forgot to clean the build directory
between builds.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-31 15:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-30 21:20 [Bug c/13526] New: Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-30 21:42 ` [Bug optimization/13526] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-30 22:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-30 22:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-30 22:34 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2003-12-31 16:03 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).