public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug inline-asm/9074] [alpha-linux] gcc fails to compile kernel on wildfire
       [not found] <20021227155601.9074.172090@bugs.debian.org>
@ 2003-05-24 16:41 ` neroden@gcc.gnu.org
  2003-05-25 23:45 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: neroden@gcc.gnu.org @ 2003-05-24 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9074


neroden@gcc.gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|target                      |inline-asm





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug inline-asm/9074] [alpha-linux] gcc fails to compile kernel on wildfire
       [not found] <20021227155601.9074.172090@bugs.debian.org>
  2003-05-24 16:41 ` [Bug inline-asm/9074] [alpha-linux] gcc fails to compile kernel on wildfire neroden@gcc.gnu.org
@ 2003-05-25 23:45 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
  2004-01-02  6:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-08-26  4:37 ` [Bug target/9074] " rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia@physics.uc.edu @ 2003-05-25 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9074


pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-05-25 23:39:24
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu  2003-05-25 23:39 -------
See Falk's comment.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug inline-asm/9074] [alpha-linux] gcc fails to compile kernel on wildfire
       [not found] <20021227155601.9074.172090@bugs.debian.org>
  2003-05-24 16:41 ` [Bug inline-asm/9074] [alpha-linux] gcc fails to compile kernel on wildfire neroden@gcc.gnu.org
  2003-05-25 23:45 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
@ 2004-01-02  6:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-08-26  4:37 ` [Bug target/9074] " rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-02  6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-02 06:34 -------
You have to remove the static or add -fno-unit-at-a-time to the command line.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2003-05-25 23:39:24         |2004-01-02 06:34:05
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9074


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/9074] [alpha-linux] gcc fails to compile kernel on wildfire
       [not found] <20021227155601.9074.172090@bugs.debian.org>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-01-02  6:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-26  4:37 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-26  4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-08-26 04:36 -------
Yes.  It's unfortunate, but hard-coded register numbers get that way.

The correct way to fix this is to use the new "c" register constraint
and to not use $27 as an explicit asm register.  I've had to make similar
changes to glibc.

I'll take care of getting this change pushed into the kernel.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9074


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-08-26  4:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20021227155601.9074.172090@bugs.debian.org>
2003-05-24 16:41 ` [Bug inline-asm/9074] [alpha-linux] gcc fails to compile kernel on wildfire neroden@gcc.gnu.org
2003-05-25 23:45 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2004-01-02  6:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-26  4:37 ` [Bug target/9074] " rth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).