From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17548 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2004 18:39:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17538 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jan 2004 18:39:49 -0000 Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 18:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040103183949.17537.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20021002075601.8126.o.lauffenburger@topsolid.com> References: <20021002075601.8126.o.lauffenburger@topsolid.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/8126] [3.3/3.4 regression] Floating point computation far slower in 3.2 than in 2.95 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-03 18:39 ------- We will unlikely redesign reg-stack for this release :( hope for the best in the future -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|3.4.0 |3.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8126