From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27259 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2004 16:30:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27250 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2004 16:30:08 -0000 Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 16:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040106163008.27244.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031114211618.13057.bryner@brianryner.com> References: <20031114211618.13057.bryner@brianryner.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/13057] [3.3 Regression] regparm attribute not applied to destructor X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00532.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-01-06 16:30 ------- Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 Regression] regparm attribute not applied to destructor "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org" writes: | PR c++/13057 | * class.c (build_clone): Copy type attributes from the original | function to the clone. I've looked at this patch. I'm wondering if you believe a backport would be safe for branch. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13057