From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16724 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2004 04:44:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16714 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jan 2004 04:44:56 -0000 Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 04:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040109044456.16712.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040103211215.13558.pommier@gmm.insa-tlse.fr> References: <20040103211215.13558.pommier@gmm.insa-tlse.fr> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/13558] [3.4 Regression] ICE (illegal code) at cp/friend.c:200 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00781.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-01-09 04:44 ------- Gaby, which DR are you referring to? There is an old DR (360 IIRC) which says that we don't need typename in elaborated type specifiers, thus allowing: friend class T::X; -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |giovannibajo at libero dot | |it, gdr at integrable- | |solutions dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13558