From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17536 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2004 17:59:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17501 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2004 17:58:59 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040111175859.17500.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "rz at linux-m68k dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20020909143600.7871.rz@linux-m68k.org> References: <20020909143600.7871.rz@linux-m68k.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/7871] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on legal code, global register variables problems X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01125.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rz at linux-m68k dot org 2004-01-11 17:58 ------- Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on legal code, global register variables problems On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 04:39:02PM -0000, simonmar at microsoft dot com wrote: > A plea for keeping the global register variable feature: our Haskell > compiler GHC (http://www.haskell.org/ghc/) absolutely relies on this. could you please test the patch I just sent out on a few architectures? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7871