* [Bug c++/13659] error: no matching function for call to
2004-01-12 16:47 [Bug c++/13659] New: error: no matching function for call to larsbj at gullik dot net
@ 2004-01-12 16:49 ` larsbj at gullik dot net
2004-01-12 16:50 ` larsbj at gullik dot net
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: larsbj at gullik dot net @ 2004-01-12 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From larsbj at gullik dot net 2004-01-12 16:49 -------
Created an attachment (id=5463)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5463&action=view)
testcase 1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/13659] error: no matching function for call to
2004-01-12 16:47 [Bug c++/13659] New: error: no matching function for call to larsbj at gullik dot net
2004-01-12 16:49 ` [Bug c++/13659] " larsbj at gullik dot net
@ 2004-01-12 16:50 ` larsbj at gullik dot net
2004-01-12 17:30 ` [Bug c++/13659] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: larsbj at gullik dot net @ 2004-01-12 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From larsbj at gullik dot net 2004-01-12 16:50 -------
Created an attachment (id=5464)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5464&action=view)
testcase 2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/13659] [3.4 Regression] error: no matching function for call to
2004-01-12 16:47 [Bug c++/13659] New: error: no matching function for call to larsbj at gullik dot net
2004-01-12 16:49 ` [Bug c++/13659] " larsbj at gullik dot net
2004-01-12 16:50 ` larsbj at gullik dot net
@ 2004-01-12 17:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-12 17:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-12 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-12 17:30 -------
Confirmed, a regression that needs to be fixed before 3.4 get released.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-01-12 17:30:40
date| |
Summary|error: no matching function |[3.4 Regression] error: no
|for call to |matching function for call
| |to
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/13659] [3.4 Regression] error: no matching function for call to
2004-01-12 16:47 [Bug c++/13659] New: error: no matching function for call to larsbj at gullik dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-12 17:30 ` [Bug c++/13659] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-12 17:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-12 17:41 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-12 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-12 17:39 -------
Related to bug 13658.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/13659] [3.4 Regression] error: no matching function for call to
2004-01-12 16:47 [Bug c++/13659] New: error: no matching function for call to larsbj at gullik dot net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-12 17:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-12 17:41 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-01-15 14:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-01-12 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-01-12 17:41 -------
This testcase proposed by Alexandre Oliva:
--------------------------
namespace foo1 {
template <class T> void f(T);
}
namespace foo2 {
template <class T> void f(T, T);
}
namespace foo {
using namespace foo1;
using namespace foo2;
}
using foo::f;
int main() {
f(1);
f(1, 1);
}
--------------------------
shows the lookup regression without strong using.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/13659] [3.4 Regression] error: no matching function for call to
2004-01-12 16:47 [Bug c++/13659] New: error: no matching function for call to larsbj at gullik dot net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-12 17:41 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-01-15 14:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-15 14:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-15 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-15 14:45 -------
Subject: Bug 13659
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: aoliva@gcc.gnu.org 2004-01-15 14:45:16
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog name-lookup.c name-lookup.h parser.c
pt.c
Log message:
PR c++/13659
* name-lookup.c (validate_nonmember_using_decl): Take scope and
name by value, instead of computing them.
(do_local_using_decl, do_toplevel_using_decl): Add scope and name
arguments. Pass them to validate_nonmember_using_decl.
* name-lookup.h (do_local_using_decl): Adjust.
(do_toplevel_using_decl): Likewise.
* parser.c (cp_parser_using_declaration): Likewise.
* pt.c (tsubst_expr): Likewise.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3883&r2=1.3884
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.33&r2=1.34
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/name-lookup.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.13&r2=1.14
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.155&r2=1.156
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.814&r2=1.815
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/13659] [3.4 Regression] error: no matching function for call to
2004-01-12 16:47 [Bug c++/13659] New: error: no matching function for call to larsbj at gullik dot net
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-15 14:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-15 14:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-15 17:46 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-15 17:46 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-15 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-15 14:46 -------
Subject: Bug 13659
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: aoliva@gcc.gnu.org 2004-01-15 14:46:02
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup: strong-using-3.C using-10.C
Log message:
PR c++/13659
* g++.dg/lookup/strong-using-3.C: New.
* g++.dg/lookup/using-10.C: New.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3379&r2=1.3380
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/strong-using-3.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using-10.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/13659] [3.4 Regression] error: no matching function for call to
2004-01-12 16:47 [Bug c++/13659] New: error: no matching function for call to larsbj at gullik dot net
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-15 14:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-15 17:46 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-15 17:46 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-15 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/13659] [3.4 Regression] error: no matching function for call to
2004-01-12 16:47 [Bug c++/13659] New: error: no matching function for call to larsbj at gullik dot net
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-15 17:46 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-15 17:46 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-15 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-15 17:46 -------
Fixed
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread