From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-81711-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29900 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2004 17:41:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29891 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jan 2004 17:41:51 -0000
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:41:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040112174151.29890.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040112164741.13659.larsbj@gullik.net>
References: <20040112164741.13659.larsbj@gullik.net>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/13659] [3.4 Regression] error: no matching function for call to
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01260.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2004-01-12 17:41 -------
This testcase proposed by Alexandre Oliva:

--------------------------
namespace foo1 {
  template <class T> void f(T);
}
namespace foo2 {
  template <class T> void f(T, T);
}
namespace foo {
  using namespace foo1;
  using namespace foo2;
}

using foo::f;

int main() {
  f(1);
  f(1, 1);
}
--------------------------

shows the lookup regression without strong using.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13659