From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30895 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2004 09:18:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30879 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jan 2004 09:18:08 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040114091808.30875.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031006200259.12527.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org> References: <20031006200259.12527.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/12527] [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux, miscompiling genconstants X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01515.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-14 09:18 ------- What is also silly is that apparently an ARM maintainer thinks this is critical, yet according to this audit log no ARM maintainer has tried to solve this in the past three months. Richard, is anyone working on a fix for this? Should arm/unknown-elf.h default to another CPU? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12527